Culture


The Internet doesn’t destroy the boundaries between the professional and the amateur: it just complicates them. You see that in the way Markos Moulitsas is getting depicted in the mainstream press as DailyKos becomes a political force to reckon with in Democratic politics, and you see it in the complex knots the networks are tying themselves into trying to figure out what they stand for in the age of YouTube and Rocketboom.

You also see it in the rise of perhaps the first true YouTube stars: the Two Chinese Boys. When I was doing research about online video earlier in the spring, everyone I talked to who had used YouTube recognized these boys immediately: their dorm room lip-synching to American pop hits is ridiculously endearing and, especially given their fondness for Yao Ming jerseys, globalizationalicious.

It’s not surprising that they’ve already been tapped for a “viral ad” by Moto . I was, however, surprised to learn that they’d recently graduated from art school, with sculptures of themselves mid-performance submitted as their final projects. Maybe I’m imposing my own ideas of what it means to be an art school student, but it does change my sense of what their videos are about when I know they were made by two people already spending all their time thinking about artistic production. What had previously seemed adorably naive now seems no less adorable, but more thought out and more pointed. My sense of them as amateurs-gone-pro has changed to one of pros-in-training-gone-pro. Which is a rather different thing, you will admit.

I’m also, I’ll admit, really tickled by the sculptures, which seem simultaneously to be a celebration of their bizarre pop-cultural achievement and a send-up of it. Are these boys the next generation Gilbert & George? We shall see.

Mad Lit Professor Puts Finishing Touches on Bloomsday Device

(Sadly, the title’s the best part. But after that title, do you really need more?)

Hunting down the airplane quote from yesterday in Everybody’s Autobiography, I found another passage I’d marked out of sheer homesickness when I lived in Ann Arbor:

I also lectured in Brooklyn and that was interesting… because I met Marianne Moore and because an attentive young man accidentally closed the door on my thumb and we had to go into a drugstore to have it fixed. It was dirty the drugstore, one of the few things in America that are dirty are the drugstores but the people in them sitting up and eating and drinking coffee and milk that part of the drugstore that was clean that fascinated me. After that I was always going in to buy a detective novel just to watch the people sitting on the stools. It was like a piece of provincial life in a real city. The people sitting on the stools and eating in the drugstore all looked and acted as if they lived in a small country town. You could not imagine them ever being out in the streets of New York nor the drugstore itself being in New York. I never had enough of going into them.

In the past week, I have had both an MRI and a CAT scan (both for entirely unthreatening conditions, worry not). So I feel qualified to tell you that if you have a choice between the two, choose a CAT scan — it’s faster, quieter, and you get to ride back and forth on the little exam table inside something that strongly resembles a donut.

The MRI machine, on the other hand, is loud, oppressively small, and takes a lot longer. It did, however, give me time to think about Gertrude Stein.

In Everybody’s Autobiography, Stein talks about flying all over America during the book tour for The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, and looking down from the plane.

Quarter sections make a picture and going over America like that made any one know why the post-cubist painting was what it was. The wandering line of Masson was there the mixed line of Picasso coming and coming again and following itself into a beginning was there and the simple solution of Braque was there…. [I] always wanted the front seat so I could look down and what is the use, the earth does look like that and even if none of them had seen it and they had not very likely had not but since every one was going to see it they had to see it like that.

Or, as she put it in an earlier lecture, “No one is ahead of his time, it is only that the particular variety of creating his time is the one that his contemporaries who also are creating their own time refuse to accept.”

Why was I thinking about this?

Well, the MRI is, as I said, loud. But it was loud in a particular way — a persistent thunk thunk thunk, with a ch-ch-ch-ch-ch bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp bomp layered on top of it at irregular intervals and varying pitches for the bomp. That is, it sounded a lot like a minimalist composition.

It wasn’t a particularly good minimalist piece of music: it was more like a first draft by a novice composer. But it brought home to me how much Reich and Glass and all the rest were completely of their time, in all the ways Stein was talking about. And in the same way that when Stein looked down from an airplane and could see art where others saw an incomprehensible otherness, I owe the hours I’ve spent with Glass and Reich for the ability to find beauty while lying utterly still in a magnetic-resonance imaging chamber for half an hour as my arms and legs slowly fell asleep.



The Pogues, New York 3/16

I had a seriously bipolar week last week — some ridiculously high highs and some nastily low lows — but one of the highest points of all was getting to attend the first New York show of the reunited Pogues’ tour.

(Well, not quite all the Pogues reunited. My college friend Kenji would say that the Pogues without Cait O’Riordan is just a bunch of drunk Irish guys, and much as it pains me to admit it, he has a point, except for the part where they’re not all Irish.)

Shane MacGowan is heavier now, and has longer hair — he looks kind of like Bono’s older brother, if Bono’s older brother was a toothless alcoholic. I could understand maybe half of what he was saying, and I was doing better than most of the people around me. But he is still a rock star: you couldn’t take your eyes off him when he was on stage. And he can still sing, and he still has that banshee howl. And the band was playing fierce and hard, and they were all happy to be there, and when the audience howled for “Fairytale of New York” Jem Finer’s daughter came out to sing the female part, and she and Shane danced across the stage together while fake snow fell in the Nokia Theater. It was nostalgia, and celebration, and bacchanal and sadness all mixed in together, the way the Pogues have always been, and it was wonderful to be a part of it, even fifteen years later.

I got name-checked on Eschaton, for noting (in comments) that an article Atrios pointed to misquoted Kanye West’s famous “George Bush doesn’t care about black people”* in a way that introduced stereotypically “black” grammatical errors.

This can only reinforce my street cred as a massive, massive grammar, spelling, and punctuation nerd. Holla!

* One of my favorite throwaway moments in the last Arrested Development episodes was the T-shirt Franklin had on that read “George Bush doesn’t care about black puppets.” Perfect.

Were it not completely sold out, I would encourage everyone I know to go check out the Sydney Theater Company’s production of Hedda Gabler at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, where Cate Blanchett is acting a smoking hole through the center of the BAM Harvey stage in the title role. Her Hedda is by turns terrifying and trapped, violent and weak, petty and brave — all the contradictions held together in the form of a woman who has had to keep all of her anger and ambition inside, where it has rotted and leaked out as a pestilence.

The rest of the cast is fantastic, with a Tesman whom you can actually believe Hedda might have convinced herself she could be satisfied, and a completely unrecognizable Hugo Weaving playing Judge Brock as an utterly charming menace — a combination, I realized when I thought of it, of his two most common screen personae.

I was riveted to the stage by Blanchett’s performance most of all, and in no small part because I could not remember how the play ended. I haven’t read the thing in at least ten years, since I took a seminar in grad school on gender and the 1890s with Martha Vicinus. Vicinus is aptly immortalized in James Hynes’s novel The Lecturer’s Tale as a vampire turned department chair, about which the less said the better. She was also the only professor I ever had, in my all-too-lengthy education, who refused to approve a paper topic that was appropriate for the class because she just wasn’t interested (a New Historicist reading of James’s Portrait of a Lady: she told me she didn’t like James, so he was out of bounds. For a class on gender in the 1890s. Sound effect: my head exploding). So my memory of the class, and the rest of the reading, tends to be colored by her ability to suck the life out of the material we did cover. There was nothing bland about this production, though, and it added a lot to my enjoyment in the end to be watching it half-blind: for all the “aha, right, here we are” of the guns coming out in the first act, there was a “holy shit, that’s right, she destroys it” in the last. I had thought about seeing the awesome-sounding Heddatron before this (it has, sadly, already closed) but I’m glad I didn’t: I got to feel the force of Blanchett’s performance, and the vivid ferocity of the production, without newer memories cluttering my view.

Although I will admit, I do find myself wanting to reread Hynes, or at least the opening department meeting scene…

Thursday evening, my friends Amy, Lisa, and Ed and I went to see Sweeney Todd, Lisa and I for the second time, Amy and Ed for the first. Lisa felt that it was a less intense experience from Row N than from Row F, which I mostly agreed with, though I did also appreciate from an aesthetic perspective the opportunity to see the entire stage clearly at once — for such an intimate production, there’s a lot going on. Also, I was fascinated by some of the changes they’d made to the text, particularly the added lines of dialogue in “A Little Priest” and the improvements to Act 2. It’s nice to be reminded that theater, as a live art, is also an art that changes over time in ways that we the audience, who attend one performance and leave, don’t usually get to see.

This is not, however, the point of my post.

The point of my post is that after seeing Lisa and Ed off to the subway and helping Amy negotiate a cab fare back to New Jersey, I started walking to the Times Square subway station, remembered I had an early-morning appointment on Friday, and decided to treat myself to a taxi. A car pulled up almost immediately, I got in and gave the driver directions, and I slumped back into my seat.

“You come from theater?” the driver asked in a heavy Russian accent.

“Yes,” I said.

“You go to theater often?”

“Not as often as I’d like to,” I said honestly.

The driver then explained that he was hoping I would know something about the theater, because he wanted to rent a costume for a poetry reading he would be participating in on Saturday, and he hoped I might have some idea of where he could go for it.

“What sort of costume?” I asked.

“An SS uniform,” he said.

Please feel free to imagine how freaked-out I was by this. I slid a little closer to the passenger-side door, mumbled something about the large number of costume shops across the borough of Manhattan, and prayed for no traffic all the way home.

“Oh,” he said, a few moments later, “don’t worry! I’m Jewish too. I should have said. I’m sorry.”

“Then why do you want to dress up as an SS agent?!?”

The story as it eventually came out over the course of the next couple of miles was this: the cabdriver was a formalist Russian poet (the word “iambs” in a Russian accent is just a joy to hear, by the way) who had a fairly fraught relationship with the editors of this avant-garde literary journal sponsoring the reading, who would occasionally publish his work but mostly looked down on him as boring. For the reading, they had set up a series of rules for the readers that included every reader having to be onstage during the entire evening — which both he and I agreed defeats half the purpose of a literary reading, which is to hang out with your friends and drink — and every reader having to come dressed in only black and white. I at this point mentioned Capote’s 1960s Black and White Ball, of which he had not heard, and we considered this data point together.

Anyhow, his idea was to come to this reading dressed in his SS uniform, sit on stage in it all evening long, and when it was his turn to read, he was going to read one series of poems that used a lot of slang and curse words, and another that was “pornogrrrapheek.” Sort of a you think you’re more shocking than me? I’ll show you shocking! gesture. I suggested that perhaps the people who are already coming to avant-garde poetry readings are the people least likely to be shocked, and he countered with a commentary on the self-regard of the Russian-language avant-garde in America. I admitted that English-language literary movements tended to the same self-regard, with, I have to admit, several pointed examples that I chose not to share coming to mind.

As we crossed the Manhattan Bridge, he launched into a critique of American culture and the marginal role assigned to poetry within it. Come on, I said, it’s always been the case that poetry is a minority taste. Think of Sir Philip Sidney, circulating his poetry in court! Look at Virginia Woolf, founding the Hogarth Press so her friends could have a place to publish!

“No, no, you go back too far,” he said. “Think of Allen Ginsberg.”

“Allen Ginsberg!” I said. “Allen Ginsberg would have been a star whatever he did. The man had incredible charisma. Did you ever get a chance to hear him read?”

It turned out that not only had my poet-driver heard him read, he had co-translated “Howl” into Russian in the mid-90s. There had been a few places where the meaning escaped them, so they’d called Ginsberg up and he’d met with them at Brooklyn College and explained it to them. He was still very grateful for that. He admitted that as he had gotten older, he liked Ginsberg’s work less than he once had, but still “there is a place in every poem that just speaks to me.” I told him I knew exactly what he was talking about.

We shared reminiscences (and in my case, a second-hand story from Ian) about Ginsberg as he negotiated the local turns that led to my corner. When he dropped me off, I did the only thing I could do, which was to give him a fifty-percent tip. “Think of it as my patronage of the arts,” I said.

“Thank you,” he said. “Maybe I will use this to rent my costume.”

Seen on the streets of Glasgow

Yesterday, sitting under the beehive dryer at Devachan, listening to The Sunset Tree on my iPod nano, the disconnect between the comfortable pampering of my surroundings and the painful autobiographical stories that underlay the genius music I was listening to, the music that I was using to keep myself occupied during the twenty minutes I had to sit and sip filtered water and wait for my hair to dry perfectly, became strong enough to seem funny. Right, I thought, the commodification of experience under capitalism. I seem to remember reading something about this.

« Previous PageNext Page »